SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management (C_THR81_2605) Sample Questions:

1. A consultant is validating a manager-driven internal movement process in a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core tenant before a pilot launch. In the web-based UI, the transaction saves for all tested employees, but for one newly introduced employee category the expected post-save update to a related employment information field does not occur when the movement reason is marked as temporary.
Permanent movement reasons work correctly for the same category, and older employee categories behave as expected for both cases. The customer wants to keep a single standardized movement process across the tenant and does not want HR operations to repair the related field manually after each temporary movement.
What should the consultant investigate first?
Response:

A) Ask HR operations to maintain the related employment information field manually for temporary moves in the new category until after pilot completion.
B) Reclassify employees in the new category into an older category during temporary moves so the existing update behavior can be reused.
C) Review the transaction configuration or derivation dependency for temporary movement reasons in the newly introduced employee category, then correct the post-save update logic.
D) Grant managers direct edit access to the related employment information field so they can complete the missing update in the same transaction cycle.

2. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Regional Manager Access for Claims Boundaries</strong> A regional manager can access employees in one assigned claims region but cannot view a surge-team position that belongs to their temporary coverage responsibility. Another unassigned underwriting support position appears in their review list.
What should the consultant validate first?
Response:

A) Whether the permission role, target population, and regional responsibility assignment align for both assigned and unassigned records.
B) Whether the regional manager should be given access to all records until the surge-team position list is corrected.
C) Whether HR operations can review the surge-team position instead of the regional manager during SIT.
D) Whether the employee creation import should be reloaded before any access testing continues.

3. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; District Manager Access for Store Cluster Boundaries</strong> District managers request temporary access to all store and warehouse positions so they can help clear open rehearsal items before final manager testing. The HR governance owner wants district-level visibility controls to remain observable.
Which configuration approach best handles this governance-versus-governance prioritization?
Response:

A) Grant cross-district access temporarily and rely on post-rehearsal review to identify any inappropriate record visibility.
B) Restrict district managers from all warehouse positions until store manager testing is fully complete.
C) Keep current access unchanged and classify all blocked rehearsal items as evidence that the district model is secure.
D) Validate assigned-cluster access and target populations with representative district managers before considering any limited exception.

4. A consultant is testing a workflow for manager-submitted temporary reporting-line adjustments in SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management. In the public cloud web-based environment, requests for all tested populations save and enter workflow correctly. However, for one newly added operational population, requests that include both a temporary end date and a position-linked approval impact bypass the intended intermediate review and go straight to the final approver.
Existing populations with the same combination still route through the intermediate review step. The customer wants to preserve the shared workflow framework because separate population-specific workflows would increase post-go-live maintenance. The consultant must correct the routing behavior without redesigning the wider approval process.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

A) Create a separate workflow for the new operational population so the intermediate review is always included for those requests.
B) Review the routing condition or rule precedence for the new population, then correct the logic for requests combining temporary end date with position-linked approval impact.
C) Ask managers in the new population to stop using temporary reporting-line adjustments until the workflow design can be reviewed later.
D) Add the intermediate reviewers directly to the final approval stage so affected requests still receive additional oversight before completion.

5. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Operations Manager Access for Campus Boundaries</strong> Operations managers request broader visibility across all campus and facilities positions so they can help clear rollout planning items. The HR governance owner wants campus-level access boundaries to remain visible during the planning cycle.
Which configuration approach best handles this governance-versus-governance prioritization?
Response:

A) Grant cross-campus access temporarily and rely on post-planning review to identify any inappropriate record visibility.
B) Restrict operations managers from all facilities positions until academic department validation is fully complete.
C) Keep current access unchanged and classify all blocked planning items as evidence that the campus model is secure.
D) Validate assigned-scope access and target populations with representative operations managers before considering any limited exception.

Solutions: